Activity 4.2 Environmental Policy Framework
Davis
and
Lewicki
Identity- In this section it
overall analyses who they are
in certain perspectives(Jobs,
morals and ethnics,
values, and where do they live)
Characterization- Has to do with
makes them who they are whether
in values or beliefs
Conflict management- How
people are able to find things
on how good it is to find the
desire and solution to a certain
problem
Fact-Finding- based on how
well you are in wanting to frame
a certain fact
Social Control- Where people
think about how social issues
are solved or viewed as.
Power- How people are able to
power through many things
involving conflicts or
persuasions.
Bryan, T
Legal Environment- Pays
attention to a lot of things
involving laws, procedures
that are legal, any conflicts
that are in the environment
Political Environment-
Basically consists of environmental
conflicts wanting to get resolved
as well as paying attention to
societal institutions, and other current
political atmospheres.
Economic Environment-
More to do with the economy
regarding industries and their
roles in the economy as well as
focusing on societal rates
Cultural Environments-
Looks at the societal stand regarding beliefs
like religion and other things like gender
roles, and values
Demographic Environment-
Seems to be more involved in
geographical stance like populations
and migrations and agricultural
production
Technological Environment-
Focuses a lot on todays
societies more like sciences,
medicine, transportation, communications
and traits that regard more the environments
Kurrer, C
Environmental action
Programs-
Implementing more policies
as well as when groups get bigger
they tend to want to protect it
more
Characterization Frames-
More like how people are viewed
by others and moreover how things
like stereotypes are made regarding
the person
Conflict Management-
Moreover what people pay
attention to and how they would
go about solving it regarding
the situation, which would help
how problems develop
Fact Management- How
people would respond to
facts given to them and how much
they'd pay attention or trust
those facts overall
Risks- Depends on how people
view their risks based off on how
much they're dedicated to getting
the result they want and so overall
being persuaded by ambition
Views of Nature-
Pretty much how someone
views the nature environment
and the human interaction
effect
Based on everything stated above the reason I chose these frameworks is because they're so common and could be used to give so many answers. Moreover, I believe that based on the readings I did learn a lot and did learn that in my opinion these frameworks would make sense to a lot of people. One of the examples that I would use would be the "Characterization Frames". And the reason why I'm using that as an example is because of how many answers I could've given regarding how people are viewed and what they think about them, as well as their personality. Furthermore, that certain topic can go many ways whether it's regarding one person individually or someone else or a whole group. Overall, characterizations also help us in building our identities. An example of this would be in the reading given by Davis and Lewicki where it states that conflicts increase whenever someone's identity is in danger. And so the reason I gave that example is because in one of the frameworks one of them is based off "Conflict management" and so it's agreeable to say that some things can tie with other things regardless of how it's viewed. When looking at each of the topics made on each framework they all share a similarity regarding the different main ideas they each share. In the first and last framework they share some similarities by showing the same results, which came from someone who shared their own opinion on the matter for each one and what each one would mean. However, with the second one it would seem to have gotten more specific with things regarding long headings given. Overall, even if the responses for the second one are longer it still shares the same basic answer as the first two.
And so after everything that was stated this shows that after the opinions given by me it shows that many of the answers could've gone so many ways yet could've gone back to the same point given. The headings are each based off every article, but all share the similarity with wanting to give every humans basic response on showing what they think about the headings given to them.
Citations-
Bryan, T. (2003). Context in environmental conflicts: Where you stand depends on where you sit. Environmental Practice, 5(3), 256-264.
Davis, C. B., & Lewicki, R. J. (2003). Environmental conflict resolution: Framing and intractability--an introduction. Environmental Practice, 5(3), 200-206.
Kurrer, Christian. “Environment Policy: General Principles and Basic Framework.” Fact Sheets on the European Union | European Parliament, European Parliament , Nov. 2020, www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets/en/sheet/71/environment-policy-general-principles-and-basic-framework.
Comments
Post a Comment